GRE写作是最能体现考生英语水平的题目，因为是不仅考验着考生的语言功底，还要求这考生的思维以及逻辑能力，但是考生却常常会犯些低级的错误，比如打字错误，下面小编就和大家分享GRE写作字失误扣分原因分析，来欣赏一下吧。
根据GRE考试中作文部分的评分标准，因为文章中出现的打字和语法等错误，最多可能会导致0.5-1分的扣分。虽然看似分值很少，但由于GRE作文是按照满分6分计算，因此哪怕是0.5分也非常重要。因此，在GRE作文中，考生应努力避免因为打字错误而导致的扣分，这样才能在写作部分拿到更好的成绩。
想要避免在写作中出现打字错误，首先要找到错误原因并加以区分，看看是什么导致的打字出现问题，并根据错误原因采取针对性措施避免错误。一般来说打字错误的原因主要分为以下三种：
因为GRE考试为机考，而且考试时间相当紧张，一些平时电脑用得比较少的考生可能因为不习惯键盘输入，再加上担心考试时间不够而给自己心理上带来了一些额外压力，强迫自己加快打字速度，这样就有可能造成打字错误。
避免方法：针对这种原因造成的打字问题，小编建议大家，特别是那些键盘用得比较少的同学，能够在平时备考过程中就提前使用电脑先适应起来，进行限时的写作练习时就可以通过电脑打字进行，只要熟悉了用法，一般就不太会因为打字太快而出现打字错误了。
GRE考试的词汇量虽然没有明确要求，但其实数量还是不少的。有些同学在背单词的时候，可能只是记住了它的长相和基本含义，对于词汇的拼写和具体用法则没有太过留意，刚好混了个脸熟。而到了写作中，想要使用这些单词的时候往往就会因为没有彻底掌握而出现各种拼写和用法上的问题。
避免方法：如果考生是因为这个原因而产生了打字错误，那么就需要把词汇基础再好好巩固一下，特别是对于那些其实没有彻底掌握到位的单词，应该进一步加强记忆，以避免出现拼写和使用上的错误。
3. 手脑不协调手速跟不上思路
有些考生在写文章时会因为思路中断无以为继而痛苦不堪，但也有考生会出现思路太顺反而手速跟不上这样幸福的烦恼。相信大家在写作中可能也偶尔进入过文思如泉涌的状态，脑子里的想法一个接一个，感觉下笔顺畅无比。但这种时候，打字速度反而会跟不上，有些考生为了抓住这种状态而拼命加速，结果反而因为不当心把一些单词给拼错造成了扣分。
避免方法：如果大家是因为这种原因犯错，小编的建议是先写再说，但写完一定要回头检查一下。打字错误一般来说只要通过返回检查，很容易就能被找出来。所以只要能保证检查一遍，那么就不太会再出现这种问题了。
Truly innovative ideas do not arise from groups of people, but from individuals.When groups try to be creative, the members force each other to compromise and, as a result, creative ideas tend to be weakened and made more conventional. Most original ideas arise from individuals working alone.
I agree with the speaker on that truly innovative ideas arise from individuals.Nevertheless, it is unfair to claim unilaterally that the groups tend to weaken creative ideas without thinking of their positive effects on the ideas; it is equally important for groups to examine, modify, or even reject the ideas.
First of all, truly innovative ideas are destined to arise from individuals in that inter-personal thinking process is so far impossible. This is to say, when we sit still and have a cluster of phenomena, theories, statistics and so forth of a certain issue in our mind, we are thinking it over yet with no assistance at all. After all it is impossible for one to intrude into other's mind. Following this principle, innovative ideas spark off during the process of meditation, and they are the produced by one's own effort. It is equally possible, however, for people to be inspired by each other, yet this is by no means assistance in thinking. Clues, hints, inspirations are to remind people of things ignored or taken for granted, but have nothing to do with the process of thinking, that is, to sort out the whole vision and draw conclusion. In one word, innovative ideas arise from meditation, which is solely limited within one body, one brain. Therefore innovative ideas are always the product of individual's work.
Nevertheless, it does not suggest that innovative ideas then have nothing to do with group work, and actually it is just the opposite. When a novel thought is brought up, it is of great importance to fully evaluate its validity, feasibility, and consequences if carried out. This point need no further illustration if we think of a father who resolutely stops his 6-year-old son from playing matches. The kid might have intended to try something new, driven by an innovative idea, yet the whole house might have caught fire also since the boy is incapable of dealing with accidents. This is the same case in academic fields. In a chemistry lab for example, a novel route design of synthesizing a new compound is never carried out without further evaluation. Practical conditions such as equipments, reagents, and economic efficiency, namely yield per cost, are always taken into consideration and sometimes restrict the application of those ideas.
This is to say, innovation is usually good but not always practicable. This claim is fully demonstrated in the political field. Governors of all levels must take holistic views of the situation and make balanced decision in order to avoid mistakes; innovative ideas alone cannot justify their practicability and goodwill to others. For instance, when we look back, the development of plastic industry has resulted in great loss in the global ecosystem. Thus we see the disastrous consequences of carrying out such innovative yet premature ideas.
Hence, it is necessary for the groups to assess, remedy, and conclude the value and use of innovative ideas. All innovative ideas should be brought to discussions. With the clash of skeptical attitude of others to the advocating behavior of the thinker, fallacies made in a haste can be easily found and eliminated, which rectifies, sometimes supplements the idea. I don't agree with the speaker on his/her judgment of group work as compromising, weakening and conventionalizing innovation. Group work promotes those justified and useful innovative ideas and rejects those invalid, sometimes dangerous ones, as we see the case between father and son, in a chemistry lab, in all nations around the world. Only after the group censorship can the innovative ideas be carried out and benefit people, and this is the time when its innovativeness is fully appreciated.
In conclusion, I concede that most original ideas arise from individuals, yet I believe the group effort on these ideas should never be downplayed. It is the group that judge,reject or develop these ideas; this process is equally important with the innovative thinking.
What most human beings really want to attain is not knowledge, but certainty. Gaining real knowledge requires taking risks and keeping the mind open―but most people prefer to be reassured rather than to learn the complex and often unsettling truth about anything.
What does most human beings want is not discovery and change but reassurance.Although discoveries and changes are the real impetuses of human civilization, most people prefer reassurance than innovations and changes in that in this world most people are conservative and the discoveries and changes would sometimes harm some ones' benefit, which based on the obsolete systems.
On the one hand, in fact, most people value what they have obtained much more than what would be gain through new ways. This conservative kind of thinking in some sense is very common indeed since trying new ways always means taking risks of losing the present benefit. Take many Chinese workers for example. In China now,during the transformation of economy system, many factories and companies are under the danger of bankruptcy due to their rigid ways of thinking. And the workers in these companies or factories do not have positive attitudes neither. They ignore, or we can say give up, the better chance such as leave the old companies and find a new one which would be more suitable or quite for a short time to study some new skills; but stay where they are to wait for reassurance from the companies or government. the reason for this kind of behaviors is that they are fear for losing the jobs, whish however have little points after all. Simply put, they think they can survive if they keep the salary, but maybe lose everything when taking risks. Actually, these people fail to see the wealth behind changes and discoveries. No pain, no gain. One reluctantly loses something, he/she would not gain more important and valuable.
On the other hand, discoveries and changes would bring new systems and value and moral standards, which would necessarily break the outdated ones. In this sense,discoveries and changes could harm some ones or some classes' benefit. Therefore, it is not difficult to understand the resistance against new things and the preference of reassurance to the obsolete system. The Industry Revolution is just a case in point.
The significant change had brought human beings into a new stage of both material and spirit; but during the revolution, many people hold the point of view that the change is very dangerous to human civilization. Such individuals included peasants,old noble men and some government officials. The fundamental reason for this situation was that such a profound and overall change shook the old social and economy system and thus those depended on such a system felt they were threatened.
For example, the peasants lost their lands and the old noble men lost their taxes from the peasants; even the government officials, were in the fear of losing their positions.Thereby, for the men who would still receive benefit from the obsolete system, they would prefer reassurance than changes and discoveries.
It is true that sometimes changes and discoveries would bring some damage to the present society; yet they would automatically build a new one full of vigor and creativity. So people should not be restrained with the conservative ideas and open their minds to see the future benefit they would gain from the new system built by changes and discoveries. Anyway, new things are always prior to the old ones.
★ GRE背单词记不住怎么办
上一篇：GRE写作易错扣分原因分析
下一篇：托福综合写作怎么写
